Antigua and Barbuda Seeks US Gambling Trade Dispute End

Antigua and Barbuda Seeks US Gambling Trade Dispute End

Gaston Brown, Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda, who brought up the united states’s trade dispute with the US at the United Nations General Assembly month that is last. (Image: winnfm.com)

Antigua and Barbuda, the tiny twin-island Caribbean country which has been in an gambling that is online dispute with the United States for the decade, is to enter into talks while the two edges seek to go towards a solution. A meeting is followed by the move involving the islands’ Prime Minister Gaston Browne and US Trade Representative Michael Froman.

The David and Goliath battle began when Antigua and Barbuda objected to the block imposed by the federal government on its citizens that are own using the islands’ online gambling services. In 2003, Antigua and Barbuda complained to the planet Trade Organization (WTO) that America’s stance contravened the General Agreement on Trades and Services (GATS), an international treaty, drawn up by the WTO in 1995, which is created to remove barriers to trade.

The result, which likely embarrassed the usa and astonished probably also Antigua and Barbuda, was that the WTO sided using the islands, ruling, in March 2004, and however in 2007, that by refusing market that is full to online gambling operators on the islands, the US, a paid-up member of the WTO, was at breach of its treaty obligations.

$3.4 Billion in Trade Sanctions

Buoyed by its success, Antigua and Barbuda filed a claim for $3.4 billion in trade sanctions against the united states, within the type of authorization to ignore US patent and the laws of copyright, arguing that this had been the value of trade lost being a total result regarding the restriction of online gambling services between the two heart of vegas real casino slots countries. This would potentially have allowed the hawaiian islands to disregard the intellectual property rights of US firms, such as for instance those in the movie and music industry, so that you can resell their assets.

The US, which argued, and continues to take action, that it never meant its dedication to GATS to include on the web gambling, offered different undisclosed concessions to the islands rather than those demanded, but refused to make the nature of these concessions general public, despite phone calls from Congressmen Barney Frank and Ron Paul to do so.

The situation remains unresolved,but still burns brightly in the minds the island’s citizens today. Simply last thirty days, Browne brought the matter up at the United Nations General Assembly, where he called on the US to settle the matter, a move that prompted the renewed talks. Both parties have now agreed to construct group to come together on the dispute.

‘we am encouraged that my administration has been able to secure an ending up in the United States Trade Representative, Ambassador Froman, so early,’ said Browne. ‘Ambassador Froman is just a Cabinet-level officer of the United States Government and this should facilitate decision-making on policy matters.’

History of on the web in Antigua and Barbuda

Antigua and Barbuda ended up being an adopter that is early of gambling, creating a framework for regulation as far back as 1994, whenever industry was in its infancy. Low taxes and investment in technology infrastructure soon began drawing operators. By the year 2000, the islands had 93 online gambling licensees have been turning in $ 7 billion in revenue between them. This had been also around the time that the US started breaking down on online gambling operators and banks that are barring processing transactions, and for that reason the number of licensees began to plunge, decimating the industry on the islands.

By 2002, the amount of operators had dropped to 38 and, by the year that is next when Antigua and Barbuda filed its complaint to your WTO, over 80 percent had left the island.

Trump Taj Mahal Protests Create Atlantic City Gridlock

24 everyone was arrested as Taj Mahal union workers protested reduced benefits near Carl Icahn’s Tropicana in Atlantic City. (Image: Ron Tarver/philly.com)

Trump Taj Mahal employees reduced Atlantic City to gridlock this past week, blocking roads in protest against Trump Entertainment’s plans to cut retirement benefits and benefits. The embattled company is seeking permission from a bankruptcy court to split contracts with workers in an effort to keep the Taj Mahal available and prevent Chapter 11.

Twenty-four people were arrested as hundreds of members associated with the Unite Here 54 union blocked traffic at the busy downtown intersection of Missouri and Arctic Avenues in a show of orderly ‘civil disobedience.’

No one was reported hurt during the protests and none of the protestors who had been arrested attempted to resist. While Unite right Here said that 750 individuals attended the demonstration, police estimated the numbers at around 300.

Trump Entertainment has stated it’s going to be forced to close the Taj on 13th unless the employment concessions are granted november. It can be demanding $25 million in aid from local government, along with a significantly reduced tax assessment. Trump Entertainment has additionally requested authorization to be taken over by billionaire investor Carl Icahn, the major holder of its debt, by transforming that debt into ownership. As owner, Icahn would invest $100 then million to keep the Taj alive, but that’s ‘if and only if’ the concessions are granted.

Protestors Blame Icahn

Significantly, the demonstrations took place near the Tropicana, which is owned by Icahn, rather than the Taj, and it is clear that lots of employees blame him for the risk to their advantages; many held placards featuring pictures of Icahn, emblazoned because of the slogan, ‘Billionaire picking over our bones.’

This week’s protest took place in the 10th anniversary of the similar labor dispute that saw members of Unite right Here 54 walk out of seven Atlantic City gambling enterprises, effectively shutting them straight down for per month.

‘When they were rolling in cash, they desired to go on it all away from us ten years ago,’ said union president Bob McDevitt.

Workers are now concerned one casino cutting benefits could trigger an effect that is domino. ‘Casino gambling, when it came here 38 years ago, promised middle-class jobs,’ said the Rev. John Scotland, a neighborhood presbyterian minister and some of those arrested. ‘Whenever we allow the Taj to simply take away advantages, all the casinos will get rid of them.’

Trump Name Removed

Earlier in the week, the Trump name was removed by employees from the front of the Taj. Donald Trump established a lawsuit months that are several for breach of the licensing agreement he finalized with Trump Entertainment 5 years ago. As the Taj Mahal, along with the recently shuttered Trump Plaza, had been when one of ‘The Donald’s’ pet projects, the casino was left by him business in ’09, negotiating a deal with Trump Entertainment to retain a 10 % stake, in return for continued utilization of the Trump manufacturer. Ever since then he has had nothing at all to do with the management for the Trump properties, and it has been fiercely critical of its owners.

‘This represents a great success for us,’ said Ivanka Trump, who confirmed the elimination of the title from casino signage. ‘This has been an ongoing struggle and we have been litigating it for some months.’

PPA’s John Pappas Makes Federal Ban Views Crystal Murky

John Pappas, PPA President, makes some patently unclear statements about their stand on a federal online ban. (Image: Bloomberg/article.wn.com)

The Poker Players Alliance (PPA) will fight any legislation that seeks to ban online gaming at a federal level, even if it contains a carve-out for on-line poker. That is the message from John Pappas, president of the grassroots company that fights for the interests of Web poker players throughout the United States.

Well, that’s what it seemed like Pappas ended up being saying, but a subsequent follow-up statement in an interview made his views, shall we say, murky to express the least.

Pappas was reacting to a quantity of rumors circulating of a move to push through a federal bill to ban remote gaming with a carve-out for poker during Congress’ forthcoming lame duck session. Several panelists during the recent G2E gambling expo in Las Vegas repeated the rumors, including Bally Technologies CEO John Connelly, who said he expected an initiative to produce ‘everything apart from poker unlawful’ this November.

‘There’s truly opportunity for some shenanigans to happen [during the lame duck session] and everybody into the video gaming industry should be keeping a close watch about what Congress may do,’ warned Pappas. a duck that is lame refers to your period when Congress meets after elections have occurred, but before newly elected representatives’ terms begin.

Some posters on poker forums were alarmed at Pappas’ statement, seeing it as being a departure from the PPA’s stated goals. The PPA offered full support in 2012, when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) and Senator Jon Kyl (R-Arizona) were examining the viability of such a bill.

Federal Carve-out Acceptable, Or Is It?

However, Pappas later clarified his position. Sort of.

‘If there was a bill that banned on line casino games but legalized on-line poker at the federal level, we would support that all day long,’ he told NJ.com. Wait, did not he say early in the day that without casino games, online isn’t sustainable? We’re confused.

Pappas says he is worried that the ‘carve-out’ for poker that would not legalize the game at a federal level would merely represent a continuation of the status quo, whereby it could be up to individual states to decide if they wanted to legalize and manage, with the exception that online casino gambling would no longer be an alternative for them. On a state degree, he states, online poker needs the additional revenue provided by online casinos to gain a foothold.

‘We’re going to fight enamel and nail to safeguard the interests of poker players, but poker-only in the US might not be considered a model that is sustainable benefit players, long-term,’ he explained. ‘We as a poker community need to observe that the prosperity of poker often is created on other forms of gaming,’ he included. ‘ If you take off all other games in the usa market, investment and interest would shrink considerably.’

Like we said…huh?

Realpolitik

It’s seems likely, too, that the PPA feels it needs to stand strong, under its own terms, against Adelson additionally the proponents of Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) towards the bitter end. Just if RAWA is passed by Congress, the case scenario that is worst for the PPA, will it be essential to engage in a spot of realpolitik and work to negotiate a carve-out for poker.

However, possibly a far more real threat to the PPA than the lame duck session may be the Republicans taking throughout the Senate next year as predicted, hence toppling internet poker sympathizer Reid from his position as majority frontrunner. This would undoubtedly favor Adelson’s cause as a major donor to the republicans.